Gold heats up on warming inflation

 
Gold and gold stocks trended higher in May, as inflationary concerns and a weakening dollar propelled gold to over US$1,900 per ounce for the first time since January.

Gold moves on inflation (... finally)

There has been ample talk and plenty of anecdotal evidence of inflation this year, none of which has seemed to elicit much of a response from gold…until this month. The first inflation-related report was released on May 12 from the Bureau of Labor and Statistics (BLS)—surprising the market with a 4.2% annual increase in the consumer price index (CPI). Gold fell that day, as the yellos metal continued to take a skeptical view on inflation.

However, the following day brought a 6.2% surprise in the BLS’s producer price index (PPI) and gold resumed its march to US$1,900 per ounce. On May 14, the University of Michigan’s one-year consumer inflation expectations spiked to 4.6%. Then, on May 25, the Conference Board’s 12 month inflation expectations also soared to 6.5%.

Finally, on May 28, the US Federal Reserve’s (Fed’s) preferred inflation gauge, the core Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) price index, climbed to 3.1%. We assume economists have baked the pandemic base effect into their forecasts. Yet all of these measures beat analysts’ expectations, which suggests inflation maybe becoming more of a problem.

Since May was the first month in 2021 that excessive inflation was actually reported in primary economic indicators, we believe that gold responded relatively nicely with an overall US$137.74 (7.6%) gain to end the month at US$1,906.87 per ounce. Gold stocks continued to lead gold out of its six-month correction with the NYSE Arca Gold Miners Index advancing 14.1%.

It’s been awhile

Market measures of five-year inflation expectations are currently in the 2.5% to 3.0% range, which is in line with past post-recession levels. However, it has been many years since investors have had such a strong outlook for inflation. The Fed’s 5-year forward breakeven rate is at seven year highs while 5-year inflation swaps and treasury inflation protected securities (TIPS) breakeven rates are both at levels last seen in 2008.

The Fed, as well as many economists, believe that inflationary pressures will be transitory, brought on by micro- and macro-economic responses to the pandemic. Inflation typically sees a temporary surge as the economy emerges from recession. However, there is mounting evidence that the current environment is less like the one that followed the Global Financial Crisis (GFC) and more like the 1970s.

The GFC was a crisis of banking failures and bailouts in which the financial system could not function normally and the Fed was authorised to pay interest on bank reserves for the first time. Unlike the GFC, the banks have remained healthy throughout the pandemic crisis and the financial system has thrived, thanks in part to the Fed’s rapid and massive response. In addition, the government wrote checks to the majority of American families and the money supply has increased as never before outside of World War ll. All of this liquidity has been sloshing around the economy creating financial bubbles. Now it is beginning to create wage and price inflation, and the Fed is loath to do anything about it.

The inflationary regime of the 70s had its roots in the Great Society launched by President Johnson in 1964 – 65. Like today’s Biden agenda, Great Society programs created new major spending on education, medical care, urban problems, poverty and transportation. According to Wikipedia, the main goal was the total elimination of poverty and racial injustice. When two oil price shocks occurred in the seventies, the high price of oil, combined with government spending on social programs and the Vietnam War, drove inflation to double digits.

What’s different these days?

Oil prices don’t have near the impact on today’s economy that they did in the 1970s. However, prices today are rising across a much broader range, from oil to metals, lumber and agricultural commodities. Producers are less willing to commit capital to increase production in this cycle, while the transition to a green economy is beginning to lift demand and/or costs to levels that may require prices to rise further. Many CEO’s from manufacturing to consumer goods companies speak of rising costs and/or expectations to raise prices this year and next.

In addition to commodities, here are other areas that suggest higher inflation could become more permanent:

  • M2 money supply – the measurement of money supply including cash and checking deposits, as well as savings deposits, money market securities, mutual funds and other time deposits – is growing in the 20-30% range, twice the rate of peak money growth in the 1970s.
  • The housing shortage appears to be a systemic, lasting problem caused by the scarcity of land, over-regulation, and a shortage of labour.
  • If the US dollar weakness seen in 2020 (and again in the last two months) continues, imports will become more costly.
  • The offshoring of cheap labor driven mainly by the industrialisation of China has stalled and globalisation may be reversing.
  • Job openings surged in March to a record high, yet April nonfarm payrolls rose at just 27% of expectations. Many employers are having trouble finding qualified workers.

The the PCE rose 3.1% in April, its fastest pace since 1992. The Fed claims it has the tools to deal with unwanted inflation, but will it use those tools? The Fed raised rates to quell the inflation of the 1970s, at the cost of a severe recession in 1981. Back then, the debt/GDP ratio was around 25%. Now, with a debt/GDP of around 100%, a similar rise in rates would likely increase debt service costs to ruinous levels. Heavy debt loads tend to dampen economic activity. While former Fed Chair Paul Volker courageously faced a formidable challenge then, whoever is appointed Fed Chairman in February may face an impossible challenge that might lead to reluctance to do anything that causes economic or social hardship.

Facing the music

This is the first time in over 30 years that inflation has become a credible risk. While we won’t know until 2022 whether the recent rise is a temporary aberration of the pandemic, it is not too early to think about possible changes in spending patterns and investing.

Gold reacts to inflation when it becomes excessive and/or out of control. The chart shows that below an annual CPI change of 3%, there is no correlation between gold and the CPI. The correlation turns mostly positive above 3%, and above 4%, a more linear trend is established. In May, gold prices may have crossed a higher threshold if inflation is indeed here to stay.

Gold highly correlated with inflation above 3%

Gold Highly Correlated With Inflation Above 3%

Source: VanEck, Scotiabank. Data as of April 2021.

Published: 11 June 2021

IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES

VanEck Investments Limited ACN 146 596 116 AFSL 416755 (‘VanEck’) is the responsible entity and issuer of units in the VanEck Vectors Gold Miners ETF. This is general advice only, not personal financial advice. It does not take into account any person’s individual objectives, financial situation or needs. Read the PDS and speak with a financial adviser to determine if the fund is appropriate for your circumstances. The PDS is available here.

An investment in GDX carries risks associated with: financial markets generally, individual company management, industry sectors, ASX trading time differences, foreign currency, country or sector concentration, political, regulatory and tax risks, fund operations and tracking an index. See the PDS for details. No member of the VanEck group of companies guarantees the repayment of capital, the payment of income, performance, or any particular rate of return from any fund.

NYSE® Arca Gold Miners Index® is a trademark of ICE Data Indices, LLC or its affiliates (“ICE Data”) and has been licensed for use by VanEck in connection with the US Fund.  Neither the Trust nor the Fund is sponsored, endorsed, sold or promoted by ICE Data.  ICE Data makes no representations or warranties regarding the Trust or the Fund or the ability of the NYSE Arca Gold Miners Index to track general stock market performance.

ICE DATA MAKES NO EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, AND HEREBY EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE WITH RESPECT TO THE NYSE ARCA GOLD MINERS INDEX OR ANY DATA INCLUDED THEREIN.  IN NO EVENT SHALL ICE DATA HAVE ANY LIABILITY FOR ANY SPECIAL, PUNITIVE, INDIRECT, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING LOST PROFITS), EVEN IF NOTIFIED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES.

Please note that the information herein represents the opinion of the author, but not necessarily those of VanEck, and this opinion may change at any time and from time to time. Non-VanEck proprietary information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but not guaranteed. Not intended to be a forecast of future events, a guarantee of future results or investment advice. Historical performance is not indicative of future results. Current data may differ from data quoted. Any graphs shown herein are for illustrative purposes only. No part of this material may be reproduced in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without express written permission of VanEck.

© 2021 VanEck